Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

 SHORT PAPER: CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW This as

 SHORT PAPER: CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
This assignment will allow you to research and better understand the Constitutional Convention
in Philadelphia in 1787.  The assignment’s purpose is to enhance the historian’s understanding of
the early American founding era by investigating and interpreting primary and secondary source
evidence related to the Constitutional Convention.
INSTRUCTIONS
You will write a 2-page short research paper on a key person, event, idea, or action of the
Constitutional Convention of 1787. The paper must use at least two scholarly sources, but no
more than three sources total. One must be a primary source and one a secondary source.
Citation and paper format must apply current Turabian formatting. The paper must be a full 2
pages but must not exceed 2 ¼ pages with footnotes applied. So be concise in your writing and
verify proper citations, including the use of footnote Ibid. and shortened versions.
Overall, you must:
1) Identify the key person, event, idea, or action from the Convention.
2) Provide a very brief historical narrative of the identified topic.
3) Explain the significance of your selected topic.
4) Rationalize how this key person, event, idea, or action impacted the founding.
Your paper’s body must include an identifiable introduction with a well-crafted thesis statement
and a summative conclusion.  The title page and bibliography do not count toward the 2-2 ¼
page requirement. No headings should be used (except on the Bibliography page). Also, the
paper must be written in the third person. You should utilize the template from the LU Online
Writing Center – Writing Style Guide website and reference the sample paper instructions and
information. 

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

  Now that you have learned about competing ethical theories, write a thread tha

 
Now that you have learned about competing ethical theories, write a thread that compares and contrasts a Christian ethical theory with a competing ethical theory. Since we have already looked at ethical relativism in Discussion: Relativism vs Absolutism, you may choose from any metaethical theory covered in Moral Choices or Talking About Ethics except ethical relativism. That means you can choose from Virtue Ethics, Natural Law, Ethical Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Duty Ethics in contrast to a Christian ethical theory.
How does each system define “the good?” How does each claim to know “the good?”
What, if anything, do these systems have in common? What, if anything, are their key differences?
Which theory do you think is the stronger ethical theory? Defend your answer. This final question should take up the majority of your thread.
Be sure to carefully define your terms, articulate the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and defend your position. You are expected to support your position with rational arguments, fitting examples, and expert sources. Any quotes or information used from sources other than yourself must be cited using footnotes in current Turabian format and will not count towards the total word count.3 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at
least 500–600 words. The student must then post 1 reply of at least 500–600. You must try to
respond to a classmate who has not received a reply yet. For each thread, students must support
their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in Turabian format. Each reply must incorporate
at least 1 scholarly citation in Turabian format. Biblical references are highly encouraged, but
will not count as an academic source. Any sources cited must have been published within the last
five years. Acceptable sources include the course textbooks, books, journal articles, periodicals,
and similar publications. Sources such as Wikipedia and online dictionaries do not count as
academic sources and should not be used. 

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

 SHORT PAPER: CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW This as

 SHORT PAPER: CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
This assignment will allow you to research and better understand the Constitutional Convention
in Philadelphia in 1787.  The assignment’s purpose is to enhance the historian’s understanding of
the early American founding era by investigating and interpreting primary and secondary source
evidence related to the Constitutional Convention.
INSTRUCTIONS
You will write a 2-page short research paper on a key person, event, idea, or action of the
Constitutional Convention of 1787. The paper must use at least two scholarly sources, but no
more than three sources total. One must be a primary source and one a secondary source.
Citation and paper format must apply current Turabian formatting. The paper must be a full 2
pages but must not exceed 2 ¼ pages with footnotes applied. So be concise in your writing and
verify proper citations, including the use of footnote Ibid. and shortened versions.
Overall, you must:
1) Identify the key person, event, idea, or action from the Convention.
2) Provide a very brief historical narrative of the identified topic.
3) Explain the significance of your selected topic.
4) Rationalize how this key person, event, idea, or action impacted the founding.
Your paper’s body must include an identifiable introduction with a well-crafted thesis statement
and a summative conclusion.  The title page and bibliography do not count toward the 2-2 ¼
page requirement. No headings should be used (except on the Bibliography page). Also, the
paper must be written in the third person. You should utilize the template from the LU Online
Writing Center – Writing Style Guide website and reference the sample paper instructions and
information. 

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

This assignment will be based on this scenario. Respond to the scenario below wi

This assignment will be based on this scenario.
Respond to the scenario below with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use research to reinforce your ideas.
Now that you have gained an understanding of Red Carpet, Leroy has asked you to join in on a preliminary meeting with the VP of HR and other members of the organization to discuss change. The meeting is important because many employees are unsure of their role in the change process. In fact, the VP of HR has not settled yet on what type of change is needed or how to start the change process. Leroy has asked you to participate in the discussion to help clarify information needed about the change process.
Review the Red Carpet scenario for this course, and with your classmates, discuss the following questions that will provide insight into the change process:
In your opinion, what does Red Carpet need to change? Should the change be transformational, developmental, or transitional, and why?
What employees or employee groups should be included in the change process, and why?
What do you recommend Red Carpet do to begin the change process?

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

Chapter 5 of the course textbook discusses the brain development of the child in

Chapter 5 of the course textbook discusses the brain development of the child in early life as well as the impact of accidents and maltreatment. The required article by Perry (2009) illustrates and defends an approach to child maltreatment based on neurodevelopmental analysis that seeks to understand and treat abuse victims with reference to the areas of the brain affected.
Based on these readings, account for or respond to each of the following in your initial post:
1) Analyze the findings of the Perry study, addressing the strengths and shortcomings of the neurodevelopmental approach. Are there limits to this sort of approach, and if so, what alternative approach might add something to a neurobiological analysis?
2) Offer a real life experience, alternative study, or recent news report that in some way illustrates or casts light upon Perry’s findings.
From the above Discussion, response to classmate discussion by comparing and contrasting your respective responses to the Perry study and illustrative examples, offering constructive criticism of your respective arguments and conclusions. Additionally, identify any insights you have gained as a result of reading the responses of others.
                                                            Classmate’s Discussion
After reading these chapters my thoughts on this are that perry states the brain develops from the bottom and must be fully developed before a child is born. He further stated that psychiatric medicine is not what it should detail because many mental issues have to do with the brain when it is developed [Perry, 2007], being that a child experience different things and that will influence the brain as well as the development of the brain.
Infants seem to have a quicker response to something compared to teenagers and because of that mental health has a different view than what was originally thought.
Both of these have merit to some capacity, whereas there could be parts of the brain as well as the nervous system from what a child experienced emotionally. Perry went on to say that even with therapy it will not help the person who has experience some type of trauma, [Perry. 2007].
I have a niece who suffers from severe anxiety, and it is hard for her to go places being that she will have to interact with people and that is a mental problem for her the socialization process. She has not suffered any trauma as I know of, but if what Perry said is true, maybe she suffered something as an infant which caused her a problem with the way she interprets things presented to her now. One time I thought she was suffering from another mental issue like Autism, or something her mother was taking when she was pregnant or something her father encountered in his life as a coal worker, I have no idea, however, something happened for my niece to have socialization issues and not wanting to be alone. Perry might be absolutely correct when discussing this topic.
                                                                  References:
Perry, B D. [2009]. Examining child maltreatment through a neurodevelopment lens: Clinical applications of the neurosequential model of therapeutics. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14[4], 240-255.
Science Direct, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/neurodevelopment-theoryLinks to an external site.

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

  Now that you have learned about competing ethical theories, write a thread tha

 
Now that you have learned about competing ethical theories, write a thread that compares and contrasts a Christian ethical theory with a competing ethical theory. Since we have already looked at ethical relativism in Discussion: Relativism vs Absolutism, you may choose from any metaethical theory covered in Moral Choices or Talking About Ethics except ethical relativism. That means you can choose from Virtue Ethics, Natural Law, Ethical Egoism, Utilitarianism, and Duty Ethics in contrast to a Christian ethical theory.
How does each system define “the good?” How does each claim to know “the good?”
What, if anything, do these systems have in common? What, if anything, are their key differences?
Which theory do you think is the stronger ethical theory? Defend your answer. This final question should take up the majority of your thread.
Be sure to carefully define your terms, articulate the strengths and weaknesses of each theory, and defend your position. You are expected to support your position with rational arguments, fitting examples, and expert sources. Any quotes or information used from sources other than yourself must be cited using footnotes in current Turabian format and will not count towards the total word count.3 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at
least 500–600 words. The student must then post 1 reply of at least 500–600. You must try to
respond to a classmate who has not received a reply yet. For each thread, students must support
their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation in Turabian format. Each reply must incorporate
at least 1 scholarly citation in Turabian format. Biblical references are highly encouraged, but
will not count as an academic source. Any sources cited must have been published within the last
five years. Acceptable sources include the course textbooks, books, journal articles, periodicals,
and similar publications. Sources such as Wikipedia and online dictionaries do not count as
academic sources and should not be used. 

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

Chapter 5 of the course textbook discusses the brain development of the child in

Chapter 5 of the course textbook discusses the brain development of the child in early life as well as the impact of accidents and maltreatment. The required article by Perry (2009) illustrates and defends an approach to child maltreatment based on neurodevelopmental analysis that seeks to understand and treat abuse victims with reference to the areas of the brain affected.
Based on these readings, account for or respond to each of the following in your initial post:
1) Analyze the findings of the Perry study, addressing the strengths and shortcomings of the neurodevelopmental approach. Are there limits to this sort of approach, and if so, what alternative approach might add something to a neurobiological analysis?
2) Offer a real life experience, alternative study, or recent news report that in some way illustrates or casts light upon Perry’s findings.
From the above Discussion, response to classmate discussion by comparing and contrasting your respective responses to the Perry study and illustrative examples, offering constructive criticism of your respective arguments and conclusions. Additionally, identify any insights you have gained as a result of reading the responses of others.
                                                            Classmate’s Discussion
After reading these chapters my thoughts on this are that perry states the brain develops from the bottom and must be fully developed before a child is born. He further stated that psychiatric medicine is not what it should detail because many mental issues have to do with the brain when it is developed [Perry, 2007], being that a child experience different things and that will influence the brain as well as the development of the brain.
Infants seem to have a quicker response to something compared to teenagers and because of that mental health has a different view than what was originally thought.
Both of these have merit to some capacity, whereas there could be parts of the brain as well as the nervous system from what a child experienced emotionally. Perry went on to say that even with therapy it will not help the person who has experience some type of trauma, [Perry. 2007].
I have a niece who suffers from severe anxiety, and it is hard for her to go places being that she will have to interact with people and that is a mental problem for her the socialization process. She has not suffered any trauma as I know of, but if what Perry said is true, maybe she suffered something as an infant which caused her a problem with the way she interprets things presented to her now. One time I thought she was suffering from another mental issue like Autism, or something her mother was taking when she was pregnant or something her father encountered in his life as a coal worker, I have no idea, however, something happened for my niece to have socialization issues and not wanting to be alone. Perry might be absolutely correct when discussing this topic.
                                                                  References:
Perry, B D. [2009]. Examining child maltreatment through a neurodevelopment lens: Clinical applications of the neurosequential model of therapeutics. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 14[4], 240-255.
Science Direct, https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/neurodevelopment-theoryLinks to an external site.

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

This assignment will be based on this scenario. Respond to the scenario below wi

This assignment will be based on this scenario.
Respond to the scenario below with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. Be substantive and clear, and use research to reinforce your ideas.
Now that you have gained an understanding of Red Carpet, Leroy has asked you to join in on a preliminary meeting with the VP of HR and other members of the organization to discuss change. The meeting is important because many employees are unsure of their role in the change process. In fact, the VP of HR has not settled yet on what type of change is needed or how to start the change process. Leroy has asked you to participate in the discussion to help clarify information needed about the change process.
Review the Red Carpet scenario for this course, and with your classmates, discuss the following questions that will provide insight into the change process:
In your opinion, what does Red Carpet need to change? Should the change be transformational, developmental, or transitional, and why?
What employees or employee groups should be included in the change process, and why?
What do you recommend Red Carpet do to begin the change process?

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

   1. Personal Analysis Assignment 20% (DUE: Friday Feb 3rd) Write an 800-word (

  
1. Personal Analysis Assignment 20% (DUE: Friday Feb 3rd)
Write an 800-word (approx. 3 pages double-spaced) paper analyzing your personal background in light of intercultural awareness and interactions. NOTE: This needs to be in APA 7 formatting with: a title page, introduction, headings, double-spaced, page numbers, references, and citations from other sources. This is a 3-part personal analysis paper that should follow this outline: 
1. First, define and describe the personal and cultural values that have shaped what is important to you, especially how you process decision-making and communication. (Approx. 200 words). Talk about your personal experience (no sources required).
2. Second, explain and analyze how the culture in which you were raised, and your life experiences have shaped your understanding of Christianity; bring in 1 academic source to your analysis (approx. 300 words). 
3. Third, comment/analyze the following: how have the strengths and weaknesses of the values, cultural influences, and experiences that have shaped you help you relate to persons or groups of a different culture or religious affiliation? (e.g., How has your background shaped the way you study, work, and live in a globalized world? What kinds of interpersonal connections or conflicts may likely arise, given the nature of your first-culture background?) Bring in 1-2 academic sources to your analysis (Approx. 300 words).
 Sources must be peer-reviewed, such as journal articles and books (e-books are fine) 
  
Wikipedia or non-academic websites will not be counted as a proper source. This is to prepare you for the final research paper.

Categories
Applied Sciences homework help

   Leadership Philosophy Paper  As the BA in Leadership capstone course, the cen

  
Leadership Philosophy Paper 
As the BA in Leadership capstone course, the central activity is to articulate your synthesis of learning about leadership and yourself as a leader in the form of a personal philosophy of leadership paper. This paper is a theory that serves to explain and guide how you act, a set of beliefs/principles that ground you in how you will lead, and a set of commitments that drive your actions as a leader. 
Using course readings, material from forum discussions, and thoughts/ideas/concepts from your previous courses, reflect on the following questions:
1. Who are you? Describe your personality and the life scripts that shape your habits—your uniqueness as a human being. Specifically, tell your life story in terms of how you have prepared to take responsibility of leading yourself (Phase I) and any experiences you had leading others (Phase II). Also, use insights from your Birkman report to describe the general patterns of your personality.
2. What do you believe? Describe your core beliefs (that is, your worldview), using some of Sire’s eight basic worldview questions to describe your perspective on the world. What are your core values as a person and as a leader? How does your worldview shape your view of leadership? In answering the last question be sure to clearly define what is your understanding of leadership.
3. How will you lead yourself and others? How will you live out what you believe about yourself and the world as a leader? What is your plan to grow your leadership competence and character? 
Each question will form one of three parts, and should be about 3-4 pages. 
· At the end of Week Four you will submit Question 1.
· At the end of Week Eight you will submit Questions 1 & 2 (as one document).
· At the end of Week Twelve you will submit Questions 1, 2 & 3 (as one document).
See course outline for specific dues dates. Total length for the final paper is 9-12 pages, not including the title page and reference page. 
APA format is required. Papers will not be marked on the students’ beliefs but on how well their learnings, leadership philosophy and worldviews are articulated.
Required Texts & Materials:
George, B. (2015). Discover your true north. Wiley. 
Sire, J. W. (2020). The universe next door: A basic worldview catalog. InterVarsity Press. 
Suggested Reading
Brown B. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work, tough conversations, whole hearts. Random House.